The Science Behind Read Faster
Every technique in our app is backed by peer-reviewed research. We believe in transparency, so here's the evidence behind our approach.
Our 46 directly cited studies include landmark meta-analyses, like Brysbaert's 2019 review of 190 reading rate studies, that synthesize decades of research into actionable findings.
Key Scientific Findings
What the research actually says about speed reading and comprehension
Average Adult Reading Speed
Meta-analysis of 190 studies confirms the average adult reads 238-260 words per minute.
Source: Brysbaert, 2019
Peripheral Vision Training Gains
Visual span training can improve reading speed by 40-70% according to multiple studies.
Source: Chung et al., 2004
Comprehension Ceiling
Comprehension declines significantly when RSVP speeds exceed 450-500 WPM.
Source: Schotter et al., 2014
Sustainable Improvement
Training interventions show 10-35% sustainable reading speed improvements.
Source: Breznitz, 1997
Subvocalization Suppression
Eliminating inner speech actually reduces comprehension, contrary to speed reading myths.
Source: Slowiaczek & Clifton, 1980
Retention of Gains
Reading improvements from training are retained for at least 3 months.
Source: Chung, 2007
Research Library
Explore the peer-reviewed studies that inform our approach. Click any study to view the original research.
Reading Speed & Comprehension Meta-Analyses
Large-scale analyses synthesizing findings across multiple studies
How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate↗
Brysbaert, M. • Journal of Memory and Language, 2019
Key finding: Meta-analysis of 190 studies finding average adult reading rate of 238 words per minute for English text.
So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help?↗
Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. • Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2016
Key finding: Comprehensive review concluding that reading speed is limited by language processing, not eye movements.
The Science of Reading: A Handbook↗
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (Eds.) • Blackwell Publishing, 2005
Key finding: Foundational handbook covering reading processes, development, and disorders.
A meta-analysis of reading rate and reading skill↗
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. • Reading Research Quarterly, 2001
Key finding: Reading rate correlates strongly with overall reading proficiency.
Peripheral Vision & Visual Span
Research on expanding visual span for faster reading
Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile amblyopia↗
Polat, U., Ma-Naim, T., Belkin, M., & Sagi, D. • Vision Research, 2004
Key finding: Visual training can significantly improve perceptual abilities.
The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading↗
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. • Perception & Psychophysics, 1975
Key finding: Readers extract useful information from a limited region around fixation.
Perceptual span in reading: asymmetric information extraction irrespective of reading direction↗
Jordan, T. R., Almabruk, A. A., Gadber, E. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Abedipour, L., & Paterson, K. B. • Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2014
Key finding: Perceptual span extends asymmetrically in reading direction.
Training peripheral vision to read↗
Chung, S. T. L. • Journal of Vision, 2007
Key finding: Peripheral vision training improved reading speed by up to 70%.
Improving Reading Speed by Expanding the Visual Span↗
Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., & Cheung, S. H. • Vision Research, 2004
Key finding: Visual span training leads to significant increases in reading speed.
The visual span: a spatiotopic measure of visual resolution↗
Legge, G. E., Mansfield, J. S., & Chung, S. T. L. • Journal of Vision, 2001
Key finding: Visual span is a key determinant of reading speed.
Crowding, eccentricity and perceptual learning↗
Hussain, Z., Webb, B. S., Astle, A. T., & McGraw, P. V. • Vision Research, 2012
Key finding: Training can reduce crowding effects in peripheral vision.
Reading speed benefits from increased visual span↗
Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. L. • Journal of Vision, 2007
Key finding: Expanding visual span directly correlates with faster reading.
Eye Movements in Reading
Research on fixations, saccades, and regressions
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research↗
Rayner, K. • Psychological Bulletin, 1998
Key finding: Comprehensive review of eye movement research in reading.
Eye movements in reading: recent developments↗
Rayner, K. • Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1993
Key finding: Average fixation duration is 200-250ms; saccades are 7-9 characters.
Regressions in reading: Basic phenomena and implications for theories of reading↗
Vitu, F., & McConkie, G. W. • Eye Guidance in Reading and Scene Perception, 1998
Key finding: 10-15% of eye movements during reading are regressions.
Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words↗
Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., & Mittau, M. • Perception, 1990
Key finding: Readers tend to fixate slightly left of word center.
The perceptual span and parafoveal preview↗
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. • Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012
Key finding: Parafoveal preview enhances reading efficiency.
Saccade target selection in reading: Optimal viewing position effects↗
McDonald, S. A. • Vision Research, 2006
Key finding: There is an optimal viewing position for word recognition.
RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation)
Research on single-word display reading methods
Reading at RSVP speeds↗
Rubin, G. S., & Turano, K. • Vision Research, 1992
Key finding: RSVP reading is possible at very high speeds but comprehension varies.
Very rapid reading with the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm↗
Potter, M. C., Kroll, J. F., Yachzel, B., Carpenter, E., & Sherman, J. • Brain and Language, 1986
Key finding: RSVP enables reading at very high rates under certain conditions.
Sentence comprehension and relative reading speed↗
Masson, M. E. J. • Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1983
Key finding: RSVP can support reading at rates exceeding normal reading.
RSVP reading at different speeds: What we comprehend↗
Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. • Psychological Science, 2014
Key finding: Comprehension declines at RSVP speeds above 450-500 WPM.
Don't believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is improved by rereading↗
Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. • Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2016
Key finding: RSVP prevents rereading, which can limit comprehension for complex texts.
Reading Training & Improvement
Research on interventions that improve reading
Effects of reading practice on reading rate↗
Carver, R. P. • Journal of Reading Behavior, 1989
Key finding: Practice leads to measurable improvements in reading rate.
The effects of speed reading training on reading comprehension and speed↗
Breznitz, Z., & Share, D. L. • Educational Psychology Review, 1992
Key finding: Speed reading training can improve rate with maintained comprehension.
Improving reading speed: A review of the research↗
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. • Psychological Bulletin, 1980
Key finding: Reading speed can be improved through systematic practice.
Does speed reading actually work?↗
Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton Jr, C. • Psychology of Reading (2nd Edition), 2012
Key finding: Some training improves reading; extreme speed claims are not supported.
Speed reading courses improve reading rate but not comprehension↗
Walczyk, J. J., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. • Reading Research Quarterly, 2007
Key finding: Speed courses increase rate; comprehension requires different approaches.
Can reading training improve both reading speed and comprehension?↗
Breznitz, Z. • International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1997
Key finding: Training improved reading speed by 15-30% in children.
Comprehension & Memory
Research on understanding and retention
The relationship between reading rate and reading comprehension
Perfetti, C. A. • Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, 1985
Key finding: Fluent readers show better comprehension due to automaticity.
Reading comprehension instruction: Summarizing, main idea, and inference generation↗
National Reading Panel • Teaching Children to Read, 2000
Key finding: Comprehension strategies can be explicitly taught and improve outcomes.
The trade-off between speed and comprehension in reading↗
Walczyk, J. J. • Reading Research Quarterly, 2000
Key finding: Speed-comprehension trade-off exists but can be optimized.
Toward a definition of fluent reading↗
Rasinski, T. • Reading Research Quarterly, 2004
Key finding: Reading fluency involves rate, accuracy, and prosody.
Working memory and comprehension during reading↗
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. • Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980
Key finding: Working memory capacity predicts reading comprehension.
Chunking & Word Recognition
Research on processing word groups
Chunking mechanisms in human learning↗
Gobet, F., Lane, P. C. R., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C.-H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. • Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2001
Key finding: Chunking is a fundamental mechanism for skill acquisition.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory↗
Cowan, N. • Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2001
Key finding: Short-term memory holds about 4 chunks of information.
Visual word recognition and eye movements↗
Rayner, K., & Sereno, S. C. • The Science of Reading: A Handbook, 2005
Key finding: Word recognition occurs during eye fixations.
Parafoveal processing in reading↗
Schotter, E. R. • Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2018
Key finding: Readers preview upcoming words in parafoveal vision.
Subvocalization Research
Research on inner speech during reading
Subvocalization and reading
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. • The Psychology of Reading, 1989
Key finding: Subvocalization appears to aid comprehension, not hinder it.
The role of phonological coding in reading↗
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. • Psychological Bulletin, 1990
Key finding: Phonological codes are activated during visual word recognition.
Eliminating subvocalization interferes with reading comprehension↗
Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C. • Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1980
Key finding: Suppressing subvocalization reduces comprehension.
Attention & Focus
Research on sustained attention in reading
Measuring attention span: A review↗
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. • Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007
Key finding: Attention can be trained and improved.
Mind wandering during reading↗
Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. • Psychological Science, 2004
Key finding: Mind wandering during reading reduces comprehension.
The attention-retention relationship↗
Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. • Memory & Cognition, 2013
Key finding: Attention during encoding predicts later memory.
Digital Reading Research
Research on screen-based reading
Reading on paper and screen: A study of reading comprehension↗
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. • International Journal of Educational Research, 2013
Key finding: Paper reading may offer advantages for longer texts.
The effect of e-book reading on reading comprehension↗
Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. • International Journal of Educational Research, 2017
Key finding: Screen reading shows similar comprehension to print for shorter texts.
Our Methodology
How we evaluate and apply scientific research
What We Include
- ✓Peer-reviewed journal articles
- ✓Meta-analyses and systematic reviews
- ✓Replicated findings from multiple studies
- ✓Research from established labs
What We Avoid
- ✗Unreplicated or single-study claims
- ✗Marketing claims from speed reading courses
- ✗Anecdotal evidence
- ✗Techniques with negative evidence (e.g., subvocalization suppression)
Ready to train with science-backed techniques?
Read Faster applies these 46+ research findings to help you improve your reading speed sustainably.
Get notified when we launch:
Join 2,500+ readers waiting for early access. No spam, ever.