The Short Answer
Yes, speed reading is real. But claims of reading 1000+ words per minute with full comprehension are not supported by research. What IS supported: improvements of approximately 40% through evidence-based training, bringing typical readers from 250 WPM to 350-425 WPM with maintained comprehension.
What Research Actually Shows
Peripheral vision training can improve reading speed by approximately 40% (Chung et al., 2004). Comprehension declines significantly above 450-500 WPM for unfamiliar material (Rayner et al., 2016). Training improvements are retained for 3+ months (Chung et al., 2004). Subvocalization suppression HURTS comprehension (Slowiaczek & Clifton, 1980).
Techniques That Work
Peripheral vision training (strongest evidence). Word chunking and reducing regressions. RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation) for certain content. Regular practice with varied materials. Comprehension monitoring to maintain understanding.
Techniques That Don't Work
Eliminating subvocalization (inner speech) - research shows this hurts comprehension. Reading at 1000+ WPM - this is skimming, not reading with full comprehension. "Photoreading" or page-flipping techniques - no scientific support.